![]() ![]() But if you want to use "grouped" effects like reverb or delay, these also need one Bus each so it can be a balance. There may be more options, but two ways I know of to get individual Monitor mix :ġ) use 2 of the "Bus" channels for a L/R pair and there are 16 Bus channels. I'm only familiar with Behringer x32 rack that I have and I think it sounds great, but I think you will have a challenge getting to 10 individual stereo IEM mixs on it. I don't believe any of the above will do up to 20. The Yamaha will only do up to 14 sends of IEM mix, as 15/16 are always going to be Main L/R. I don't believe any of the above will do any more than that. The Yamaha supports 8 mono, 6 stereo outputs (plus Main L/R), so if for some conceivable reason a few folks needed stereo, there's 6 available. Entry-level and basic IEM systems are typically mono. Not all IEM systems do this, and the ones that do (it well), are not cheap. Is a stereo mix nicer? It can allow more customization, but a well mixed and EQ'd mono mix is still incredibly more functional than running a loud, blaring stage monitor.Ĭonsider that if you're attempting a stereo mix, y ou will also need an IEM system for EACH band member that supports a stereo mix. The majority of non-touring rigs and players utilize mono sends for IEM, and there's no sacrifice here. In regards to the IEM sends.I'm not sure who's telling you that there's no point in running them in mono. Output EQ Library (some specifically designed for IEM's, as well as to assist in room/venue tuning) No cross-over with the MonitorMix app (your bass player can't change the drummer's mix, and the lead singer can't access the main mix) Dedicated StageMix and MonitorMix apps that are extremely well designed for iPad/iPhone apps allowing external control. internal layout of functionality (you're not touching more than twice to get to an area of adjustment.no digging through menu screens, regardless of what task you're trying to accomplish) Library of EQ/Compression/Gate settings for various types of inputs (they're actually good) Quality, both physical construction and preamp design (amazing sound quality) tap a channel area and quickly adjust any of the 4 selected features without digging through a menu) ![]() Custom knob selection (have 4 knobs selected to do whatever you want. Custom button selection (useful for scene selection or jog through) Everything you need on one set of channels. Custom fader bank option (lay out the order of any input, output, bus, group, FX, etc fader in your own customized layout to reduce need for fader bank selection. Touch Screen that actually is responsive, and allows you amazing control with less effort (see below about 2 touch) This results in quicker setup, easier routing, better experience. USER FRIENDLINESS (the language and layout of the system is by far the most user friendly out of all the mixers you have suggested.I've used them all). I sell and install these for a living, and own/use a TF-RACK for one of my bands. I'll give you some overviews below, but if you have any specific questions please PM me. So with the above, which of these options is the best for my situation? Are there any better options reasonably priced? Pros and cons? Can these desks handle that? As far as I can tell it looks really tight on most of the models, and for some reason they all give them different names, even within the same desk! ![]() This means 20 sends (obviously not including mains), which is a lot. However, we can often have around 10 musicians on stage, and everyone I've talked to has said there's no much point in running in ears in mono. I want to keep it pretty simple ideally, wired setup with a basic headphone amplifier (no AVIOMS/Personal Mixers etc) and musicians being able to mix their feeds (aux sends) via apps from stage. Here's the kicker: Soon after implementing this desk I also want to go to an IEM system. A guy we buy a bunch of stuff through says the TF5 is pretty pricey and if I'm going to spend that much I might as well go up to the A&H GLD80, which he thinks would be overkill. I'd really like to know some pros and cons as to these desks, as there's not heaps of info online. I'm looking at purchasing a 32-channel digital mixer for my church, reasonably entry level stuff. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |